RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Dissatisfaction with body image may extend to the genital region, and the most dissatisfied with their bodies are women. To analyze the relation between body image and genital image in female, and to verify demographic and/or clinical factors related to body image and genital image. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study in 421 women. The Body Shape Questionnaire-34 (BSQ-34) was used to evaluate body image perception; scores ≤110 indicate no dissatisfaction. Also, the female genital self-image scale-7 (FGSIS-7) was used to evaluate genital self-image; scores range between 7 and 28, with higher values considered to indicate a more positive genital self-image. The relation between body image and genital image was determined using the Pearson Correlation test, as well as the relation of these with body mass index (BMI) and age. The relation between these data and genital image was determined by using the ANOVA test or the independent t-test (statistical difference was accepted as p<0.05). In order to verify predictors of dissatisfaction with body image, variables with p<0.10 were inserted into the logistic regression model and checked if they remained significant (p<0.05). RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-nine women were analyzed. The mean age was 34.7±10.2 years. The mean BMI was 24.1±3.6 kg/m², 49% were single, and the mean BSQ-34 and FGSIS scores were 83.2±30.8 and 23.8±3.4, respectively. The correlation (r=-0.24) was found between body image and genital image (p<0.001). A total of 315 women indicated to be satisfied with their body and presented an FGSIS-7 score of 24±3.3. Participants who were dissatisfied with their body had an average FGSIS-7 score of 22.6±3.3. CONCLUSION: Genital image, age, and BMI influence body image. Change in the perception of body image seems to have low correlation with genital self-image in women.
RESUMO
INTRODUÇÃO: A saúde sexual envolve diversos componentes em relação à sexualidade, como biológico, cultural, psicológico e social. Quando alguns desses fatores são atingidos, pode-se originar um quadro de disfunção sexual. OBJETIVO: investigar a qualidade de vida em mulheres com disfunção sexual. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional comparativo, de corte transversal, realizado em mulheres de 18 a 59 anos do CAAP da EBMSP. Excluídas: mulheres com histórico de doença psiquiátrica grave, portadoras de doenças crônico-degenerativas neurológicas, com dispareunia de causas orgânicas, em tratamento fisioterapêutico e gestantes. Foi utilizado a FSFI ≥ 26 para o grupo com disfunção e < 26 para o grupo comparação. Instrumentos de avaliação aplicados: FSFI e 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). A comparação das medianas dos domínios do SF-36 e FSFI entre os grupos foi realizada pelo teste Mann-Whitney (teste não paramétrico), e das variáveis categóricas com a disfunção sexual foi feita a partir do teste qui-quadrado. RESULTADOS: Amostra 36 paciente,18 em cada grupo. As variáveis sociodemográficas e clínicas que apresentaram diferença estatística foram renda (0,001) e escolaridade (0,011). No FSFI, todos os domínios apresentaram significância (0,00). No SF-36, ao comparar os dois grupos, 06 domínios apresentaram significância estatística. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados mostram que mulheres com disfunção sexual apresentam um impacto negativo em alguns dos aspectos da qualidade de vida. Importante salientar que, a escolaridade e a renda familiar não foram homogêneas entre os grupos, sendo assim, diante da característica do estudo, não é possível aferir relação causa e consequência na disfunção sexual com a qualidade vida das participantes. [AU]
INTRODUCTION: Sexual health involves several components in relation to sexuality, such as biological, cultural, psychological and social. When some of these factors are reached, a picture of sexual dysfunction may result. OBJECTIVE: To investigate quality of life in women with sexual dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, observational, observational study of 18- to 59-year-old women from the EBMSP CAAP. Excluded: women with a history of severe psychiatric illness, carriers of neurological chronic degenerative diseases, with dyspareunia of organic causes, in physiotherapeutic treatment and pregnant women. FSFI ≥ 26 was used for the group with dysfunction and <26 for the comparison group. Assessment instruments applied: FSFI and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The comparison of the medians of the SF-36 and FSFI domains between the groups was performed by the Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric test), and the categorical variables with the sexual dysfunction were done using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Sample 36 patient, 18 in each group. The sociodemographic and clinical variables that presented statistical difference were income (0.001) and schooling (0.011). In the FSFI, all domains presented significance (0.00). In the SF-36, when comparing the two groups, 06 domains presented statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The results show that women with sexual dysfunction have a negative impact on some aspects of quality of life. It is important to emphasize that schooling and family income were not homogeneous between the groups, so, due to the characteristics of the study, it is not possible to measure cause and consequence relationship in sexual dysfunction with quality of life of the participants. [AU]
